The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (19 MARCH 2014)

CEOs See No Quick Increase in Hiring

(…) Nearly half of CEOs surveyed by the Washington trade group said they expect to boost U.S. capital spending in the next six months, compared with only 39% eyeing higher spending three months ago. But while 72% of CEOs see an increase in sales in the next six months, only 37% expect to boost U.S. employment, according to the survey released Tuesday. Forty-four percent see their U.S. payrolls unchanged. (…)

Business investment and economic growth would likely rise noticeably if Congress were to rewrite the tax system in ways that cut corporate rates and narrowed loopholes, Mr. Stephenson said. “We don’t believe there’s anything that will drive economic growth like tax reform would,” he said. (…)

Events in Russia and Ukraine also appear to be influencing sentiment. The group conducted the survey between Feb. 21 and March 7, as events unfolded in the Eastern European nation. (…)

“We’re all watching this like a hawk,” Mr. Stephenson said. “We have a lot of business at stake in Europe.”

Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey

imageMortgage applications decreased 1.2 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending March 14, 2014. …
The Refinance Index decreased 1 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index also decreased 1 percent from one week earlier.

The 4-week average of the purchase index is now down about 18% from a year ago.

INFLATION WATCH

According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, the median Consumer Price Index rose 0.2% (2.2% annualized rate) in February. The 16% trimmed-mean Consumer Price Index also increased 0.2% (1.9% annualized rate) during the month. The median CPI and 16% trimmed-mean CPI are measures of core inflation calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland based on data released in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) monthly CPI report.

image

Median CPI is continuing to rise by 0.2% per month, double the rate of the weighted CPI and core CPI. Total CPI is currently +1.1% YoY compared with +2.0% for Median CPI. This -0.9% spread is slightly more than the 0.83 standard deviation since 1990. Over the last 25 years, Total CPI and Median CPI have been identical, on average, with median CPI being much less volatile and a more stable indicator of inflation. The probabilities are thus that Total CPI will soon rise towards the 2.0% YoY level. If you missed my March 17 piece on producer prices, it is here.image

CHINA RETAIL SALES SLOW DOWN

Total retail sales of consumer goods increased only 11.8% Y/Y in January and February, significantly lower than government targets in 2014. In 2013, both retail and restaurant sales Y/Y deceased significantly due to the anti-corruption campaign. Restaurant sales suffered the most but stabilized after an adjustment in 2013; however, retail sales are still decreasing. The anti-corruption campaign continues to impact sales while personal income Y/Y remains low. Therefore, retail Y/Y is likely to fall short of the government target in 2014. (CEBM Research) (Chart from Ed Yardeni)

China Slowdown Adds to U.S. Firms’ Challenges China’s broad economic slowdown is adding another worry for U.S. companies already dealing with rising wages, formidable competition for workers and selective regulation.

A survey of U.S. companies operating in China released Wednesday shows that 50% cite the falloff in growth—to 7.7% last year from a peak of 14% in 2007—as among the biggest risks they face. That is a tick higher than the 47% the American Chamber of Commerce survey received last year. (…)

The 365 companies that responded to the AmCham survey listed rising labor costs and the difficulties of finding and keeping skilled employees as among their biggest challenges. Then there is a regulatory system that often seems to come down harder on foreign companies than Chinese ones. (…)

Two out of five of the companies polled in the survey said foreign businesses are less welcome in China than in the past, while only one in 10 said they felt more welcome. Seventy percent are profitable, though.

Among the other problems of doing business in China, U.S. companies cited Internet censorship, the struggle to protect patents and copyright, and a new, lengthier system for visas. (…)

Troubles recruiting and retaining skilled employees seems incongruous with universities producing 7 million graduates a year. But companies and experts said that those students aren’t entering the labor market with the right qualifications.

“The problem is the education system hasn’t quite caught up,” said Andrew Polk, an economist at the Conference Board, a U.S. business research outfit. “You’ve got more people in the so-called skilled labor pool who aren’t quite as skilled as companies need them to be.” (…)

On the other hand, China’s well-publicized, health-threatening air pollution problem is making it harder to attract senior executives from abroad. This is now a problem for half of the companies that responded to the survey, up from a third last year, according to the AmCham report.

Yuan Falls Against U.S. Dollar China’s yuan has erased most of the gains made in the past year, as it fell sharply for the third consecutive day against the U.S. dollar after the central bank doubled the currency’s trading band over the weekend.

At 6.2009, the yuan weakened 1.1% from the 6.1351 central parity, the level set by the People’s Bank of China each day around which the currency can fluctuate.

Punch George Magnus: China’s financial distress turns all too visible

(…) The incidence of financial distress is rising and becoming more visible. The recent drop in the renminbi, and the sharp fall in copper and iron ore prices are the latest high-profile manifestations of China’s changing outlook. These are not random developments or bad luck, but connected parts of a complex economic transformation with deflationary consequences for the world economy and skittish financial markets. (…)

Slowing economic growth, chronic overcapacity and rising debt service problems in key industries are becoming more common, raising the risk of chain defaults involving suppliers and purchasers. Overcapacity recently prompted a senior executive in the Chinese Iron and Steel Association, Li Xinchuang, to say the problem was so severe it was “probably beyond anyone’s imagination”.

In an industry survey by the State Council, 71 per cent of respondents said overcapacity in iron and steel, aluminium, cement, coal, solar panels and shipbuilding was “relatively or very” serious.

Last week’s market scare, however, was focused on copper, which has fallen nearly 15 per cent this year, and by more than a third from its 2011 peak. Falling prices have embraced a swath of both ferrous and non-ferrous metals, sending ripples from Perth to Peru. (…)

Large swings in market prices are happening also for murkier – and largely speculative – reasons that hinge on the use of copper and ore as collateral for loans, and as a means of raising finance abroad and bringing it onshore to spend or lend. As the authorities clamp down on credit creation and shadow financing, falling prices, including that of collateral, will expose participants to losses, and markets to the risk of distress selling.

Pointing up The transmission effects of lower prices into emerging markets and the global economy are most likely to prove disruptive, even if the positive real income effects for consumers eventually win out.

China’s economic transformation is happening regardless. Its leaders have choices only about how to manage it, and when to accommodate what is likely to be a painful adjustment. Sage advice would be to grin and bear it now, so as to avoid harsher outcomes later. But the political willingness and capacity to do so is unpredictable.

It is still possible that China will blink, raise infrastructure and housing spending and new credit creation, and lower bank reserve requirements and the renminbi. This would introduce a sharp twist to the underlying plot, but lead to a more dramatic conclusion. (Chart from Ed Yardeni)

‘Technical’ Recession in Russia Likely in 2Q-3Q on Shock to Investment, Demand

image(…) The investment plans of private companies, especially foreign-owned, are likely to be scaled down until there is more geopolitical visibility. This grants an
adjustment to our expectations of private sector capital expenditure growth from moderation to outright contraction. This, together with a less optimistic outlook for
residential investment — on the back of tighter monetary conditions — implies a downward revision to our expectation of overall investment this year from 2 percent
growth to a 3 percent contraction.

Capex cutbacks are likely also to affect consumers via hiring and wage intentions. The household savings ratio is likely to grind higher this year, which might shave
an additional 0.5 percentage points off consumption growth. We have lowered our consumer spending outlook to 1.6 percent. Domestic demand is likely to be brought to an almost complete halt this year, following 2.5 percent growth last year and a 6.8 percent gain in 2012. A persistent slowdown in domestic demand and continuous downward revisions to company sales expectations are in turn likely to keep the pace of destocking elevated through most of the year.

Altogether, we cut our GDP growth out-look for this year to zero percent from the 1.3 percent we previously expected, which essentially implies a technical recession over the second and third quarters. (…) (Vladimir Kolychev and Daria Isakova are economists at VTB Capital in Moscow. Via BloombergBriefs)

The U.S. only exports some $40B worth of goods to Russia. Europe, some $400B.

Chile economy shrinks, German prices, Italy exports drop
  • Chile: Gross domestic product in the fourth quarter missed forecasts, with the economy shrinking 0.1 per cent, compared with consensus forecasts for a 0.3 per cent rise. Year on year, the economy expanded 2.7 per cent compared with forecasts for a 2.8 per cent increase. For the whole of 2013, the economy expanded 4.1 per cent.
  • Germany: The wholesale price index dropped at the fastest rate in four months in February, recording a 1.8 per cent decline, a faster drop than both January and December. The Zew economic sentiment indicator decreased again in March, falling by 9.1 points in March to 46.6. However, it remains much higher than the historical average of 24.6 points.
    • “In this month’s survey the Crimea crisis is weighing on experts’ economic expectations for Germany. Nevertheless, the indicator’s level suggests that the economic upswing is currently not at risk,” said Zew president Clemens Fuest.

  • Italy: The trade balance showed that exports dropped 1.5 per cent overall in January seasonally adjusted from December, while imports dropped 1.6 per cent. To the EU, exports dropped 1.7 per cent, while imports rose 1.4 per cent, and to non-EU countries, exports dropped 1.2 per cent and imports dropped 5.3 per cent. However, the November-January three-month period paints a slightly better picture, seasonally adjusted from August-October, with exports overall rising 1.1 per cent and imports falling 2.1 per cent.
U.S SHALE RESOURCES

Remember when shale gas took off, naysayers were all over predicting that costs would be too high and/or the decline rates would be too swift? BloombergBriefs updates us, offering another example of what happens when the American entrepreneur spirit is let loose:

imageSince the North American shale-a-thon began, the producing industry has steadily improved drilling, production and well completion practices, dramatically lowering costs and expanding the economically recoverable resource. In the early days of the Barnett, for example, it took 25 to 30 days to drill and complete a horizontal gas well. Now, it takes 10 days. The trend is similar across more recent oil and gas shale plays in the Lower 48.

Besides drilling rigs now being three times faster, peak production rates on new shale wells keep improving, alongside average monthly U.S. production additions (Figure 4). These trends reflect both enhanced completion techniques and the fact that drilling targets are high-graded as the industry’s understanding of specific plays ripens over time.

MORE ON U.S. SMALL CAPS

Scotiabank Equity Research adds to yesterday’s piece on small caps:

U.S. small caps are expensive on all metrics we track (P/E, P/B, P/S, P/CF). On a forward P/E basis, the S&P 600 is trading at 19.9x forward earnings, which is
close to one standard deviation above average. U.S. small caps also appear pricey relative to other small cap benchmarks and relative to large caps.

image

Our Combined Valuation Score (CVS) stands at the high-end of its historical range (blue bar in Exhibit 8). Our CVS is an aggregate of four valuation metrics and it highlights how these metrics deviate from their historical averages. We also overlay the S&P 600 performance 12-month out (red line). When the CVS hits elevated levels, the S&P 600 tends to have a more muted performance 12-M later. image

U.S. small caps are also the most expensive in the world in absolute terms.image

SENTIMENT WATCH

Thumbs down Of course, not all is rosy, as sentiment indicators are again reaching concerning levels of optimism, with the Ned Davis Research Crowd Sentiment Poll moving into extremely optimistic territory, which is typically a contrarian/bearish indication. And as we’ve noted, the last 13 midterm election years have experienced a substantial (typically first-half) pullback, with the average decline for the S&P 500 being 18.7% (thanks to Strategas Research Partners).

Thumbs up The good news is that equally consistent has been the rallies that have followed those corrections; averaging 32% for the 12 months after the correction’s finale. Our belief is that 2014 could also bring another decent-sized pullback, perhaps in the second quarter if history holds, but that we’ll end the year higher than we are now as economic growth accelerates in the United States and stabilizes globally. (Liz Ann Sonders, Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Strategist, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.)

Gift with a bow A real treat (tks David): Watch as 1000 years of European borders change

NEW$ & VIEW$ (13 MARCH 2014)

Retail Sales Increase for First Time in Three Months

Thumbs up The 0.3 percent advance followed a 0.6 percent drop in January that was larger than initially reported, Commerce Department figures showed today in Washington.  The rebound in demand was broad-based with nine of 13 major categories showing increases.

Thumbs down The reading for January was revised down from an initially reported 0.4 percent decrease. December sales were also weaker, now showing a 0.3 percent drop compared with a previously reported 0.1 percent decrease. (…)

Zerohedge:

For those curious just how much real “growth” there is in retail spending, here is the annual change in the control group, which excludes food, auto dealers, building materials and gas stations, and feeds directly into GDP: it rose 0.3% from January, even as January was sharply revised from -0.2% to -0.6%, meaning net impact on GDP for Q1 is negative!

Auto Cars and light trucks sold at a 15.3 million annualized pace in February compared with a 15.2 million rate in January, according to data from Ward’s Automotive Group.

U.S. auto retailers have 3.76 million units sitting in their showrooms, about 87 days of inventory for the big three U.S. automakers, which is well above 65 days considered manageable within the industry. The inventory-to-sales ratio on the broader auto industry has jumped to 0.25 in February 2014 from 0.20 at the
beginning of 2013.

Given sluggish gains in real disposable income and the slowdown in residential investment, which is strongly linked with light truck purchases, it will probably take several months to bring sales into alignment with inventories. The result may be slowing durable goods orders, which would reinforce the reality that the weaker
pace of growth in the current quarter may not solely attributable to bad weather.

Goldman Cuts Q1 GDP Forecast To 1.5% On Weaker Retail Sales; Half Of Goldman’s Original Q1 GDP Forecast

From Goldman:

BOTTOM LINE: Although February retail sales rose a bit more than expected, negative back revisions more than offset the front-month surprise. Separately, initial and continuing jobless claims both fell more than expected. Import prices rose more than expected in February, but declined on a year-on-year basis. We reduced our Q1 GDP tracking estimate by two-tenths to 1.5%.

As a reminder, Goldman’s original Q1 GDP forecast, as recently as a month ago, was for a growth of 3%. How things change when weathermen, pardon economists, are shocked to find it gets cold in the winter…

So, bonds up or bonds down? (BloombergBriefs)

Bill Gross, who runs the world’s biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co., cut Treasuries and U.S. government-related debt in February. “Sell
what the Fed has been buying because they won’t be buying them when taper ends in October,” Gross wrote on Twitter last week.

Jeffrey Gundlach, founder of Double Line Capital LP, said 10-year Treasury yields will slide to 2.5 percent this year. Borrowing costs will decline as the Fed tapers its bond purchases amid a slowing global economy, he said.

U.S. import prices post largest gain in a year

The Labor Department said on Thursday import prices increased 0.9 percent last month, the biggest rise since February last year. January’s import prices were revised to show a 0.4 percent increase rather than the previously reported 0.1 percent gain.

Import prices excluding petroleum rose 0.2 percent in February after advancing 0.4 percent the prior month. Compared to February last year, they were down 0.6 percent. Petroleum prices rose 4.4 percent, the largest rise since August 2012.

Ex-oil, import prices are up 0.6% in 2 months, +3.7% a.r.

China Shows Fresh Signs of Economic Weakness

Industrial output rose 8.6% year-over-year in the January-February period, down from a 9.7% increase in December, data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed Thursday. The rise in the two months—combined to adjust for distortions from the Chinese Lunar New Year holiday—is the slowest since 2009.

Growth in fixed-asset investment also eased to 17.9% year-over-year, the weakest pace since 2002, down from 19.6% last year as a whole.

Retail sales rose 11.8% year-over-year in the January-February period, down from 13.6% year-over-year growth in December. Construction starts, a key driver of growth in recent years, fell by 27% in area terms.

Despite the fact that data were combined for the two months, analysts say the economic figures so far this year may still include distortions from the period when many factories close down and migrant workers return to distant villages for the new year celebration.

“Usually the March data would be slightly better than the first two months,” said Ma Xiaoping, an economist at HSBC in Beijing.

Hmmm, please keep reading:

CHINA NOT SPRINGING BACK JUST YET

CEBM Research March survey reveals that:

  • The overall performance of steel market was below expectations in February. Generally, end demand remained weak post-Festival, the traditional start of
    industrial activity for the year.
  • 31% of responders reported cement sales were lower than their forecasts, higher than January by 24%.
  • The machinery tool manufacturers said that the demand remains at a low level; the construction machinery manufacturers and dealers said the potential buyers hesitate about the construction project starts.
  • The February CEBM Auto Sales vs. Expectations Index was -50% and the passenger vehicle sales in February saw both a decline in Y/Y and M/M growth, showing that sales conditions were below market expectations this month.
  • Container exports index is slightly below the expectation in February, and all respondents reported that shipment volume decreased after the Chinese New Year due to seasonality. The shipping fees dropped simultaneously with volume, and US routes decreased more than the Southeast Asian routes.
  • The textile exports are lackluster after the Spring Festival, leading to a pessimistic outlook in 2014.
  • Over two-thirds of our survey respondents told that department store sales adjusted for Chinese New Year effect were weaker-than expected. Moreover, majority of them expressed worries about sales in March, suggesting that weakness would probably persist for a prolonged period.

But, even though Premier Li said that the economy faces “severe challenges”, don’t get overly worried; like in the U.S., forward guidance is flexible!

(…)  As to what comes next, Premier Li Keqiang’s press conference today following the closing of the National People’s Congress was instructive. Mr Li sounded relaxed and keen to emphasize that the “about 7.5%” GDP growth target was flexible. Asked to clarify, Mr Li simply said that GDP growth “needs to sustain ample employment and income growth.”… Further ahead, the government does have room to act if growth slows towards, say, 7%. Its fiscal position is strong and there are no immediate constraints on credit growth. (Mark Williams and Julian Evans-Pritchard, Capital Economics via WSJ)

In Chinese politics, this is all one needs to know: “growth needs to sustain ample employment and income growth.”. Otherwise, the people may not be happy and a bunch of unhappy Chinese is a big, big bunch…

Despite Low Inflation, China Has Little Room to Cut Rates

(…) The 7-day repo rate, a benchmark of interbank interest rates, fell to 2.2% this week, the lowest in almost two years. Weak growth also could induce the government to cut banks’ reserve requirement ratios later this year, according to Shen Minggao, head of China research at Citigroup, freeing up more money for lending.

But there are signs that this easing is of limited use and carries serious risks. The 2008 stimulus never really stopped, and the country’s overall debt load grew to 213% of gross domestic product last year, according to Standard & Poor’s rating agency. That compares with 140% of a much smaller GDP in 2007.

Worse, it’s not clear that all that lending is going where it’s most needed. China’s banks direct much of their lending to big industrial players or local governments, which are seen as having an implicit guarantee from the aloof but more solvent national government in Beijing.

Meanwhile, small private-sector businesses have never had an easy time getting credit, in spite of government initiatives to support them. Banks are not keen on lending to new customers. According to the most recent China Beige Book, a survey of the private sector carried out four times a year, only 14% of bankers said that more than 30% of their loans went to new customers. Much credit simply went to rolling over old loans.

Tied in knots by years of these distortions, China’s financial system is doing a poor job of sending money where it’s needed. Lower interest rates would leak into financing for property developers and heavy industry, despite the government’s best efforts to channel money away from those industries.

“If money gets cheaper, it’s possible that less productive local governments and SOEs will end up sucking up more liquidity,” Mr. Shen said. “There’s a crowding-out effect.”

In most economies, low inflation would give policy makers a license to start easing monetary policy. But in China, things aren’t so simple.

Li says China defaults ‘unavoidable’ Premier says government will ensure failures no risk to economy

Two good charts from Ed Yardeni:

OECD LEADING ECONOMIC INDICATORS image

 image

New Zealand raises interest rates First developed nation to tighten since US began taper

(…) The Reserve Bank of New Zealand moved to lift interest rates by 0.25 per cent to 2.75 per cent on Thursday, having stuck at a record low of 2.5 per cent since March 2011, a month after a devastating earthquake in Christchurch killed 185 people.

Graeme Wheeler, reserve bank governor, noted the bigger than expected climb in economic growth and said inflationary pressures were increasing. The economy grew by 3.3 per cent in the year to the end of February, above the Bank’s previous estimate of 2.8 per cent growth.

“While headline inflation has been moderate, inflationary pressures are increasing and are expected to continue to do so over the next two years,” he said. “In this environment it is important that inflation expectations remain contained.” (…)

Mr Wheeler said the cash rate may be increased by a total of 125 basis points in 2014, depending on economic data, to move average inflation close to its 2 per cent target. (…)

I. Bernobul
  • From Zacks Research:
  • Do Not Believe It
    The decline the last two days is reminiscent of the beginning of the year. That is when everyone expected stocks to just keep pushing higher and higher only to get served a nasty pullback.
    Now is no different. And it deserves no more thought or consideration because as soon as you believe this is a real problem and sell your shares, that is exactly when the market will bounce.
    Solution = Just hold on to your favorite top ranked stocks and load up more on the dips. (Zacks Research)

  • From Factset
  • S&P 500 Forward 12-Month P/E Ratio: 15 YearsDuring the past week (on March 6), the value of the S&P 500 index closed at yet another all-time high. The forward 12-month P/E ratio for the S&P 500 now stands at 15.4, based on yesterday’s closing price (1877.03) and forward 12-month EPS estimate ($121.86). Given the record high values driving the “P” in the P/E ratio, how does this 15.4 P/E ratio compare to historical averages?

    The current forward 12-month P/E ratio is above both the 5-year average (13.2) and the 10-year average (13.8). The P/E ratio has been above the 5-year average for more than a year (since January 2013), while it has been above the 10-year average for the past six months. With the forward P/E ratio well above the 5-year and 10-year averages, one could argue that the index may now be overvalued.

    On the other hand, the current forward 12-month P/E ratio is still below the 15-year average (16.0). During the first two years of this time frame (1999 – 2001), the forward 12-month P/E ratio was consistently above 20.0, peaking at around 25.0 at various points in time. With the forward P/E ratio still below the 15-year average and not close to the higher P/E ratios recorded in the early years of this period, one could argue that the index may still be undervalued.

    It is interesting to note that the forward 12-month P/E ratio would be even higher if analysts were not projecting record-level EPS for the next four quarters. At this time, the Q4 2013 quarter has the record for the highest bottom-up EPS at $28.78. However, starting in Q2 2014, industry analysts are projecting EPS for each of the next four quarters to exceed this record amount. In aggregate, they are calling for 11.3% growth in EPS over the next four quarters (Q214 – Q115), compared to the previous four quarters (Q213 – Q114).

Good grief! Now, even fairly respectable organizations are sending it. Zacks’ may not be too bad (what should we think about?) but Factset is downright misleading with its 16.0x 15-year average P/E beginning in 1999. Fact-set!!!!