The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (27 MAY 2014)

Lightning CHINA CONTRACTING?

Here’s the dark view from Kyle Bass (via Zerohedge and Robert Huebscher, originally posted at Advisor Perspectives).

China’s economy isn’t just slowing down, according to Bass: It’ contracting. While China’s published rates for annual growth are still positive, Bass said the nation’s economic growth was negative from the fourth quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2014.

That is a result of excessive government spending on unproductive sectors of the economy. Bass said the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) has been more aggressive in its quantitative easing (QE) that the Federal Reserve has, but much of that money has gone into unproductive credit expansion.

China’s banking assets have grown to over 100% of its GDP in the last three years, according to Bass. If the U.S. had engaged in similar policies – which he said would translate to $17 trillion in lending over that time period – it, too, would have achieved more than 7% GDP growth.

China’s banking assets now total approximately $25 trillion, or almost three times the size of its $9 trillion economy. Its low default rate on bank loans – about 1% – is about to rise, according to Bass. Much of that lending is construction-related. Bass said that 55% of China’s GDP growth has been in the construction sector. The marginal return on those loans must be very small, he argued.
“A rolling loan gathers no loss,” Bass said, “and that’s what’s been going on in China for the last few years.” He said it is impossible to believe China could “manipulate” the inputs of its financial system without losing control of the outcomes.

Deflation is also threatening China. Bass said that its GDP deflator is now below zero. He expects the PBoC to engineer a devaluation of the renminbi as a way to stimulate exports and avert further deflation.

Bass said that if non-performing loans go from 1% to historical norms “somewhere in the teens” with loss severities of 100% for the worst loans, then China would delete its $4 trillion of foreign exchange reserves. Bass implied that China would need those reserves to stabilize its banking system, though he did not say so.

China’s leaders are fully aware of the dangers its economy faces, Bass said, and they hope to slow growth in a measured fashion, including through the restructuring of its banking system. “The jury’s out whether or not they can do it,” he said. “We actually believe they might be able to do that and that GDP [growth] is just going to slow down a lot more than people expect.”

“I’m not saying it is a calamity, a disaster or it’s going to end badly for the world,” Bass said. “All I’m saying is China is slowing down a lot faster than people think, and you need to think about how to position your portfolio for this.”

Bass advised against shorting Chinese equity as a way to capitalize on his forecast. Instead, he said, investors should look at China’s trading partners – Australia, New Zealand and Brazil. Those countries will be forced to loosen their monetary policy, raising rates and creating carry-trade opportunities.

With some supporting material:

Key Chinese Industrial Commodity Prices Keep Tumbling

(…) some high frequency indicators are once again flashing warning signals. According to the ISI Group research, exports to and sales in China by US corporations have turned materially lower after remaining stable since early 2013 – indicating weakening demand. Anecdotal evidence suggests that a similar slowdown has also occurred for Japanese and euro area firms selling to China.

The most worrying indicators however are the key industrial commodity prices. Futures on iron ore sold at China’s ports fell below $100 for the first time in years.

Iron OreSober Look

And steel rebar futures on the Shanghai exchange are also continuing to fall. Some of these declines are of course related to declining construction activity.

Steel RebarSober Look

Once again, most economists do not expect a “hard landing” for PRC because the government has enormous resources to “backstop” the nation’s economy. Nevertheless, a number of indicators from China still point to persistent risks to growth.

High five Wait, wait, there is a rosier view:

Early Signs Point to Steady Growth, Stimulus in China

Tom Orlik, Bloomberg Economist:

imagePrices for steel, a key input for everything from skyscrapers to ships, were down 4.1 percent year on year Friday, an improvement from an 8.1 percent decline at the end of April. Prices for paraxylene — ubiquitous in fabrics and packaging — also continued to fall in May, though at a slower rate than in April.

That slight improvement aligns with evidence from business surveys. The flash reading from the HSBC Markit PMI came in at 49.7 in May, up from 48.3 in April and edging close to the 50 mark that separates improving from deteriorating conditions. Market News International’s index of business conditions also ticked up, rising to 55 in May from 54.6 in April.

Those signs of stabilization in the factory sector reflect better conditions for China’s exporters. Taiwan export orders, which tend to lead China’s overseas sales by several months, registered robust 8.9 percent growth in April, the highest since the end of 2012.

Market prices also provide insights on inflationary pressure. Prices for pork — a critical variable in the consumer price index — registered a pronounced increase in May, rising 8.3 percent year on year in the opening days of the month after falling in April. That should be enough to ensure a slight increase in the CPI from April’s 1.8 percent annual increase.

Despite signs of steadying growth, policy makers are still taking no chances. On a visit to Inner Mongolia last week, Premier Li Keqiang warned that the economy faced severe downward pressure and told local leaders to “remember that development is the first task”.

Monetary policy continues edging into supportive mode. An injection of 120 billion yuan by the People’s Bank of China last week saw the seven day repo rate fall to 3.1 percent Monday, down from 4 percent at the end of April. The slope of the government yield curve has flattened and the spread between AAA corporate and risk-free policy bank yields has fallen to its lowest level in three years.

Taken together, the early signs for May point to growth in industrial output stabilizing around the 8.7 percent annual rate seen in April, improvement in exports, and a moderate increase in consumer prices. Despite that, policy makers appear increasingly determined to draw a line under the economy’s deceleration.

Easier monetary conditions as a result of the central bank’s fine tuning should help bolster lending and growth in the months ahead. (BloombergBriefs)

Pointing up In case you missed it, here’s what Premier Li said last week:

China’s economy still faces “relatively big” downward pressures and timely policy fine-tuning is needed, Premier Li Keqiang was quoted by state radio as saying on Friday.

“Currently, the economy is generally stable and we see positive structural changes, but downward pressures are still large and we cannot be complacent,” Li said during a visit to the northern region of Inner Mongolia.

“We should use appropriate policy tools and pre-emptive fine-tuning in a timely and appropriate manner to help resolve financing strains for the real economy, especially small firms’ difficulties in financing and high borrowing costs,” he said.

Such policy fine-tuning should help maintain “reasonable growth” in money supply and bank credit, he said.

Everything is there:

  • The economy is not getting worse short-term, being stable at a low level.
  • Risks are mounting and downward pressures are large.
  • Wait-and-see is over. China must move pre-emptively in a timely and appropriate manner.

Money Stay tune. Action is coming.

Currency swings take toll on consumer groups and manufacturers

(…) Last year’s slide in the South African rand – along with currency weakness in Australia, Colombia, Peru and elsewhere – cost SABMiller some $400m in the year to end March, the group reported on Thursday. Mothercare meanwhile said depreciation in the rouble and other currencies would eat into the royalties they earn on international sales that now represent more than 60 per cent of group network sales.

They have joined a procession of companies warning that adverse movements in exchange rates will hit this year’s earnings. These range from consumer groups, such as Unilever and Procter & Gamble, which are sensitive to currency swings because of their slim margins but can rapidly adjust prices, to manufacturers such as Rolls-Royce, which hedges against currency risks several years out, because of its lengthy contracts.

A year of turbulence in emerging markets currencies has proved punishing for multinationals that bet heavily on growth in the developing world to compensate for the prolonged post-crisis malaise in their home markets. The problem is especially acute for European companies, since the recent strength of sterling and the euro has exposed them to swings of some 20 per cent against some of the worst hit currencies. (…)

Yet while corporate treasurers are accustomed to hedging in major currencies, until now most have found it too expensive and impractical to protect against fluctuations in volatile and relatively illiquid emerging markets currencies that may lack developed derivatives markets. (…)

Currency Chaos in Venezuela Portends Write-Downs The highest inflation rate in the Americas and at least five currency devaluations in the past decade have turned Venezuela into a guessing game for multinational companies, which may have to take write-downs.

(…) The country’s foreign-exchange system puts companies on an uneven playing field, depending on their business. At the government’s official rate for companies that import essential goods, such as food and medicine, a U.S. dollar costs 6.3 bolivars. Companies invited by the government to participate in a middle-tier rate system can effectively buy a dollar for 10 bolivars. For companies in the next and newest tier, 50 bolivars fetch a dollar, leaving them to ponder the true value of their Venezuelan factories and inventories.

(…) companies face the quandary of which exchange rate to use when they close their books at the end of the quarter. So, investors should brace for more write-downs.

Avon Products Inc. switched to the newest government-sanctioned rate in the first quarter and took a $42 million charge, while Estée Lauder Cos. absorbed a $38 million hit. The majority of companies still are calculating asset values using more-favorable exchange rates.

Since the beginning of April, more than 100 international companies have mentioned Venezuela’s currency exchanges in their financial filings as a drag, or potential drag, on earnings, up from eight in the year-earlier period, according to data provider Morningstar.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Herbalife Ltd. and Energizer Holdings Inc., have said they would need to take write-downs of $235 million, $103 million and $62 million, respectively, if they revalued at the new rate. (…)

Auto makers have been especially hard hit because they lack the dollars to pay their suppliers. Fuel Systems Solutions Inc., a New York-based producer of natural-gas fuel systems for cars, didn’t sell a single part in Venezuela between October and April because car makers have been strapped for dollars, said Pietro Bersani, the company’s chief financial officer.

Ford Motor Co., which temporarily stopped local production of its Fiesta and other vehicles, moved to the mid-tier exchange rate in this year’s first quarter and booked a $310 million charge. Ford said it concluded it would need this exchange to access dollars in the future. The company declined to say if it would adopt the most recent exchange rate.

“We have received a commitment from the Venezuela government to help resolve the issues and to get our production up and running by the start of next month,” Ford said in a statement.

General Motors Co. wrote off $400 million in the first quarter, and said every 10% devaluation of the bolivar from the mid-tier rate would force another $100 million write-down. Chrysler Group LLC wrote off $129 million in the quarter, and warned “there may be significant changes to the exchange rate in future quarters.” (…)

Canada’s Inflation hits 2% for first time in two years, dampens rate-cut talk

Canada’s annual inflation rate rose to the central bank’s 2 per cent target in April for the first time in two years, Statistics Canada said on Friday, further dampening talk of a cut in interest rates.

Core inflation, which helps guide the Bank of Canada since it excludes natural gas, gasoline, fruit and vegetables and other volatile items, edged up to 1.4 per cent in April from 1.3 per cent in March, with prices rising 0.2 per cent on the month. Both figures again matched the median forecasts in a Reuters survey.

Mexico Cuts Economic Growth Forecast

Mexico on Friday cut its economic growth estimate for this year, after tepid growth in the U.S. and new taxes in Mexico led to a weaker-than-expected first quarter.

Gross domestic product is now seen expanding 2.7% in 2014, the Finance Ministry said, better than the meager 1.1% growth of last year but far from the 3.9% initially expected.

The government cut its estimate after the national statistics agency reported that the economy grew 0.28% in the January-March period from the previous quarter, below expectations. That translates into an annualized rate of 1.1% and means a modest improvement compared with the 0.13% growth in the fourth quarter.

On top of the weak external backdrop, across-the-board tax increases that came into force at the beginning of the year weighed on private consumption and business confidence. Also, the construction sector has been in recession for more than a year, with several home builders struggling under heavy debt.

EUROZONE RETAIL SALES TREND UP, FINALLY:

Domestic euro zone growth adding to recoverySource: FactSet, Eurostat. As of May 20, 2014 via Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

SENTIMENT WATCH

(…) Stock-market bulls have stayed the course amid continued evidence of slow but steady improvement in corporate profits and the U.S. economic backdrop. Meanwhile, some say stocks look attractive in comparison to bonds paying historically low interest rates.

Skeptics point to the fact a long-awaited acceleration in economic activity has yet to emerge, and last year’s rally has left stocks less attractively valued. (…)

It’s not quite blood-red seas and locusts, but the bears are starting to get downright apocalyptic as they trot out their warnings of an imminent breakdown in the financial markets: tumbling Treasury yields; staggering small-company stocks; incinerated Internet shares; and blown-up biotechs. There’s just one problem: Transportation stocks should be crashing if the end were truly nigh. Instead, they’ve sailed through the carnage virtually unscathed. (…)

Instead, the Dow Jones Transportation Average has gained 9.3% over the past three months, on its way to an all-time high of 7986.58 on Friday — its 14th record close this year. There’s plenty to worry about given the weakness in some parts of the market, but the strength in transports sends “a very bullish message,” says Stephen Suttmeier, technical research strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Transports have been so strong, it’s almost worrisome. Since March 2000, the S&P 500 Transport Index has gained 11% annually, more than doubling the Standard & Poor’s 500 index’s 4.1% return over that period. Because of the rally, the price of the S&P 500 transports relative to the S&P 500 has now topped the last peak reached in 1994 — 20 years ago. Transports went on to underperform the full index by 16 percentage points annually during the next six years. (…)

  • imageBUT FINANCIALS ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE

It has been an ugly year for the Financial sector.  In all three market cap ranges, stocks in the sector are underperforming their peer indices, and for all three, relative strength is at or near a 52-week low.  While stocks of all size are underperforming, large caps have been holding up the best, and as we have noted numerous times in the past, that is due in large part to the regulatory environment for the sector which tends to put the largest companies in the sector at an advantage relative to smaller rivals. (Bespoke Investment)

From Liberty Blitzkrieg blog via Zerohedge:

The retail investor is getting back into the stock market and is seemingly focused on the riskiest types of shares; unlisted penny stocks. They aren’t just dipping their toes in either, the pace exceeds that of the tech boom of the late 1990?s and has just hit the highest amount on record.

(…) The investors are buying up so-called penny stocks—shares of mostly tiny companies that aren’t listed on major U.S. exchanges—at a pace that far eclipses the tech boom of the late 1990s. Those include firms that focus on areas from medical marijuana and biotechnology to fuel-cell development and precious-metals mining—industries that are perceived by some investors as carrying strong growth potential.

Average monthly trading volume at OTC Markets Group Inc., which handles trading in shares that aren’t listed on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq Stock Market, has risen 40% this year in dollar terms from a year ago, to a record $23.5 billion. (…)

The rebound also comes as individual investors are showing signs of increased interest in stock trading in general.Discount brokers TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. and E*Trade Financial Corp. last month reported jumps in daily trading volume in the first quarter from the same period a year ago. (WSJ)

Chinese Ship Sinks Vietnamese Fishing Boat Territorial tensions in Asia continue to rise…
APPARENTLY, THIS LEFTY IS NOT RIGHT

Piketty Book on Inequality Has Errors, Financial Times Says

Thomas Piketty, author of a best- selling book on the widening gap between rich and poor, relied on faulty data that skewed his conclusions, the Financial Times reported on its web site.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (14 MAY 2014)

U.S. Retail Sales Momentum is Lost

Retail and food service sales ticked 0.1% higher last month following a 1.5% March increase, revised from 1.1%. A 0.4% increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. Sales of motor vehicles & parts increased 0.6% (9.8% y/y) in April following outsized gains of 3.6% and 2.6% during the prior two months. Non-auto sales were unchanged (2.7% y/y) after an upwardly revised 1.0% gain. A 0.6% increase had been expected. (Chart from BloombergBriefs)

image

High five Non-auto ex gasoline and Building supplies: unchanged M/M in April following +1.0% and +0.4% in previous two months.

Weekly chain store sales are up 2.7% Y/Y during the 4 weeks ended May 10, a sharp jump from +1.3% five weeks ago. May and June 2013 were pretty weak so Y/Y comps will likely improve. 

image

U.S. Import Prices Down 0.4% in April Prices for imported goods fell in April, the latest evidence of stubbornly weak inflation across the U.S. economy.

Prices for foreign petroleum fell 0.7% in April and natural-gas prices tumbled 18.5%. Prices for imported foods and beverages fell 0.7% after spiking 3.4% in March. Excluding the often-volatile categories of food and fuel, import prices rose 0.1% from the prior month and fell 1% from a year earlier. (Chart from Haver Analytics)

large image

U.S. Household Debt Increases

Household debt—including mortgages, credit cards, auto loans and student loans—rose $129 billion between January and March to $11.65 trillion, new figures from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York showed Tuesday. That was the third consecutive quarterly increase.

Behind the uptick: Mortgage balances—which make up the bulk of U.S. household debt—rose $116 billion to $8.2 trillion, thanks in part to fewer people going into foreclosure, which drags down mortgage debt. Auto-loan balances grew $12 billion to $875 billion. Student-loan balances increased $31 billion to $1.1 trillion, maintaining its place as the fastest-growing debt category.

Despite all their progress digging out of the downturn, however, U.S. consumers are displaying a heightened wariness about using credit cards or taking out new mortgages.

The amount of credit-card debt outstanding fell to the lowest levels since 2002. Credit-card balances fell $24 billion to $659 billion from the prior quarter, just slightly below the level from a year earlier. New originations of mortgages dropped for the third straight quarter to $332 billion, the lowest since the third quarter of 2011, possibly due to rising home prices in many markets that have made buying less affordable.

The figures suggest Americans are still playing it safe when it comes to borrowing, a practice that should help protect them from longer-run excesses. But the combination of weak demand for credit and slow real wage growth could bode ill for consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of economic output. (…)

Some Americans may have changed how they use credit cards in the recession’s wake, in many cases paying off their balances promptly. The share of credit-card debt 90 or more days overdue fell in the first quarter to 8.5% from 9.5%.

Lending standards for mortgages, meanwhile, remain fairly tight when it comes to younger and first-time home buyers and those with tarnished credit.

Indeed, one group shying away from debt may be younger Americans. The growth of student-loan debt, along with limited access to credit, may be preventing those with student loans outstanding from being more active in the nation’s housing and auto markets, New York Fed researchers said Tuesday.

Less borrowing by younger people for things like cars and houses is a worry because it could reduce overall consumption at a time when baby boomers are retiring and likely spending less, too. (…)

From Zerohedge:

Now, the bad news: the increase in total mortgage balances had nothing to do with a surge in mortgage demand. Quite the contrary, as we have been reporting and as bank mortgage origination bankers have felt first hand, for whatever reason mortgage origination as a business has virtually slammed shut. The Fed confirmed as much when it reported just $332 billion in originations in Q1: well below the $452 billion in Q4, and certainly below the $577 billion a year ago.

Which leads to this U.S. U-turn on mortgages:

U.S. Backs Off Tight Mortgage Rules The White House and regulators are shifting course on mortgage lending amid concern tight standards could hurt a housing rebound.

On Tuesday, Mel Watt, the newly installed overseer of Fannie Mae andFreddie Mac said the mortgage giants should direct their focus toward making more credit available to homeowners, a U-turn from previous directives to pull back from the mortgage market.

In coming weeks, six agencies, including Mr. Watt’s, are expected to finalize new rules for mortgages that are packaged into securities by private investors. Those rules largely abandon earlier proposals requiring larger down payments on mortgages in certain types of mortgage-backed securities. (…)

Mr. Watt, the former North Carolina congressman who took over as the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency in January, used his first public speech on Tuesday to lay out the shift in course for Fannie and Freddie, and pegged executive compensation at the companies to meeting the new goals. (…)

Regulators announced a series of steps Tuesday that they said could help ease standards—abruptly raised by lenders during the financial panic—and make it easier for first-time and other entry-level buyers.

Mr. Watt said that he would direct Fannie and Freddie to provide more clarity to banks about what triggers “put-backs,” in which lenders have been forced to spend billions of dollars buying defective loans sold during the housing boom. To guard against future put-back demands, lenders say they have enacted standards that go beyond what Fannie, Freddie and other federal loan-insurance agencies require.

Mr. Watt said that he hoped that the changes would “substantially reduce” credit barriers, “and that lenders will start operating more inside the credit box that Fannie and Freddie” provide.

Shaun Donovan, the HUD secretary, announced on Tuesday similar changes designed to encourage lenders to reduce similar restrictions on loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which is part of his department.

Recession-Baby Millennials Scarred by U.S. Downturn Spurn Stocks for Cash

(…) While investing in equities has dropped across the board since the recession, so-called millennials born after 1980 have continued to forsake the market even as it rebounds, according to a Gallup poll taken April 3 through April 6. Just 27 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds reported owning shares outright or in funds, down from 33 percent in April 2008, the survey found.

The aversion means the group is missing out as major indexes reach records, potentially imperiling their future financial security, especially at a time when these Americans are also shunning investments such as real estate. Instead of plunging into stocks, which can provide better returns over the long run, young people are stashing savings in bank accounts and securities that pay near-zero interest. (…)

About 46 percent of millennials with more than $100,000 to invest say they will never be comfortable in the stock market, MFS, with $423 billion under management globally, found in a survey released in February. About 52 percent of 22- to 32-year-olds said they are “not very confident” or “not at all confident” putting money in equities for retirement, according to a February 2013 survey by Wells Fargo & Co.

Affluent millennials hold 52 percent of their money in cash and 28 percent in stocks, compared with 23 percent and 46 percent for older people, a UBS survey released in the first quarter found. The study focused on 21- to 29-year-olds with $75,000 in income or $50,000 in investable cash, and 30- to 36-year-olds with $100,000 in income or assets. (…)

Among 30- to 49-year-olds, a group that includes most of Generation X and the oldest millennials, about 67 percent hold stocks this year, up from 58 percent in 2013, said Frank Newport, Gallup’s editor-in-chief. For those under 30, comprised solely of millennials, ownership was unchanged at 27 percent.

Pointing up There is probably more at play than just squeamishness over equities. Unemployment, heavy student-debt loads and the effects of the housing crisis are probably also restraining young people. (…)

Almost 45 percent of 25-year-olds had student debt at the end of 2013, up from 25 percent in 2003, based on New York Fed data. The group’s average student loan balance reached $20,926, Meta Brown, a senior economist with the research and statistics group, wrote in a blog postyesterday. It was about $11,000 a decade ago.

College enrollment is also delaying workforce entry, leaving millennials with less to spend on housing and stocks. (…)

Drop in Food Stamp Enrollment Picks Up Steam The number of Americans receiving food stamps is falling at a faster clip, down more than 1.2 million from October to February, federal data show.

The number of Americans receiving food stamps is now falling at a faster clip, with more than 1.2 million people moving out of the program between October and February, according to federal data.

As of February, the most recent data available, 46.2 million Americans received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. That’s the lowest level since August 2011 and down from the March 2013 peak of 47.7 million people. The $5.8 billion in benefits paid out in February was the lowest level since at least 2010. (…)

THE CHINESE U-TURN ON MORTGAGES:
China Central Bank Calls for Faster Home Lending in Slump

China’s central bank called on the nation’s biggest lenders to accelerate the granting of mortgages, a sign that developers’ prices cuts and incentives alone won’t boost a slumping housing market and economy.

The People’s Bank of China told 15 banks yesterday to “improve efficiency of service, give timely approval and distribution of mortgages to qualified buyers,” according to a statement posted on its website. It also urged lenders to give priority to families buying their first homes and strengthen their monitoring of credit risks.

(…) Home sales fell 18 percent in April from the previous month, according to data from the National Bureau of Statistics.

Developers scaled back housing starts by 25 percent in the first quarter, the biggest reduction ever, according to Nomura. To lure buyers, Vanke dropped prices in Beijing, Hangzhou and Chengdu by as much as 15 percent since March, according to China Real Estate Information Corp. Vanke and Poly Real Estate Group Co. (600048) are allowing buyers to delay making down payments for as long as three years in Changsha, the capital of Hunan province, according to realtor Centaline Group.

The central bank’s request to improve lending efficiency comes as China’s economic slump worsens, with unexpected decelerations in industrial output and investment growth. (…)

More than 10 million homes sit empty in China, and the number could rise to 18 million within two to three years, Nicole Wong, Hong Kong-based head of property research at CLSA Ltd., said on May 12. She cited estimates based on the company’s one-year survey in 12 Chinese cities. (…)

Lan Shen, a Beijing-based economist at Standard Chartered Plc, said the central government will have to provide more support for the housing market to recover.

“The PBOC statement probably still won’t give much incentive for commercial banks to makemortgage loans because this part of their business is not very profitable,” she said. “They might shorten the period of approving mortgage loans as a gesture to respond to the central bank, but not much on lowering the rate.”

Nomura’s Zhang said that he expects further easing of lending, such as the removal of purchase restrictions in second-and third-tier cities. He said the government may also cut banks’ reserve requirements by 50 basis points in the second quarter and a further reduction in the third quarter, making it easier for developers to get financing.

The “Quite Gloomy” Chinese Housing Market Completes “Head And Shoulders” Formation

“Self-fulfilling expectations of falling house prices, financial difficulties among developers on the back of a highly leveraged economy with huge local government debt, and a fragile financial system with a large shadow banking sector, suggest the risks of a disorderly adjustment in the Chinese economy are real and rising,”

This is what Jian Chang, Barclays’ chief China economist, said in a recent report covering the Chinese housing sector and specifically the danger of a hard landing, and judging by the most recent housing data reported by China overnight, the likelihood that the Chinese housing sector, whose problems have been extensively covered here for the past 4 years, is finally coming unglued is higher than at any time since the Lehman collapse.

Here is what China reported overnight via SocGen: New starts contracted 15% yoy (vs. -21.9% yoy in March); property sales fell 14.3% yoy (vs. -7.5% yoy); and land sales (by area) plunged 20.5% yoy (vs. -16.9% yoy previously).

It doesn’t take an Econ PhD to conclude that “the housing market situation has undoubtedly turned quite gloomy. There has been a constant news stream of falling property prices everywhere, even in the 1-tier cities. A number of local governments, as we expected, have started to ease policy locally, especially relaxation of the home-purchase restrictions.”

But nowhere is the contraction in this all important sector for China’s credit-driven bubble more visible than the following chart showing a very distinct, if somewhat mutated, head and shoulder formation in the average 70-city property price index. If and when the blue line intersects the X-axis for only the third time in history, watch out below.SocGen’s take is less than rosy:

Since 2008, there have been two periods of falling housing prices across the board: H2 2008 and late 2011. Even tier 1 cities were not spared. However, the downturns were brief and shallow. In the midst of the Great Recession, price declines lasted for about six months and 14 out of the 70 cities tracked by the statistic bureau recorded cumulative price declines of over 5%. During the previous downturn between Q2 2011 and Q3 2012, property prices in most cities fell consecutively for no more than 10 months, and only 4 cities saw prices falling by more than 5%. The turning points in both cases coincided with the beginning of credit easing. The logic is simple: most Chinese households, especially first time buyers, still need to borrow to buy, despite the high savings ratio on average. And down-payments and mortgages account for 40% of developers’ investment capital.

Which brings us to the key issue – credit, and rather its sudden lack of availability.

The housing sector is very important to the Chinese economy. Its share in total output is easily 20%, if its pull on related upstream and downstream sectors in included. And its significance to the financial system is far beyond banks’ mortgages and direct lending to developers, which account for 14% (CNY 10.5tn) and 6.5% (CNY 4.9tn) of the loan book respectively. Developers’ borrowing from the shadow banking system could potentially amount to another CNY 5-7tn. Moreover, we estimate that over CNY 10tn of other types of corporate borrowing is collateralised on real estate and another CNY4-6tn borrowing by local governments for infrastructure investment is collateralised on future revenue from sales of land-use rights. Adding everything together, the aggregate exposure of China’s financial system to the property market is likely to be as much as 80% of GDP. Hence, this is not a sector that can go terribly wrong if China wants to avoid a hard landing.

Unfortunately, housing is one of the few sectors that the Chinese government has not mastered its control over. Although policymakers have used many sector-specific means to try to mitigate the cycles of this sector over the past 10 years, it has not been very effective. Even the harshest administrative controls – home-purchase restrictions – are subject to loopholes and implementation issues. Our observation is that the short-term cycles of China’s housing market, like housing markets in many other countries, are first and foremost a credit phenomenon.

And since it is a credit phenomenon, should China continue with its recent initiative to tighten lending and purge credit market pathways, housing is first and foremost in line for a collapse.

So what is China, suddenly facing the all too real prospect of yet another housing downturn to do? Why turn on the credit spigots again, of course. At least according to SocGen:

… we think the only effective measure to ease the housing downturn is to reaccelerate, or at least stabilise, credit growth.Reportedly, the central bank has asked commercial banks to quicken mortgage lending despite the series of defaults and near-defaults of developers. Clearly, policymakers know which lever to pull, but the question is to what extent.

We agree that many Chinese cities are already suffering from over-supply issues. Although further urbanisation will continue to support demand growth, the pace of urban population growth in the next decade will still slow and there is a big affordability gap for rural migrants. Hence, if the authorities decide to use another credit binge to inflate the sector again, they will merely make the structural imbalance between supply and demand worse. There could be a middle ground. Measured and targeted credit easing might avoid a nation-wide crash, but some overly stretched cities – in terms of over-supply and leverage – will still experience severe pain, just likely Wenzhou where property prices have declined non-stop for more than two years by over 20% cumulatively.

Ah yes, being caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place.

For now the market is convinced that the worse the housing data, the more likely that the PBOC will engage in yet another massive stimulus and do what western central banks are so happy to do virtually constantly – kick the can once more. (…)

Euro-Zone Industrial Output Falters

The European Union’s statistics agency Wednesday said output from factories, energy companies and other utilities was down 0.3% from February, and 0.1% from March 2013.

The March figures suggest there was no pickup across industry during the first quarter, though there have been signs of improvement in other parts of the economy, with consumer demand strengthening and exports picking up.

imageimage

Eurozone IP is down 0.2% in Q1, 0.5% in the last 4 months but up 0.4% in the last 6 months. Energy IP has been particularly weak being down 7.2% in the last 6 months, mainly due to the warm winter in Europe. (Eurostat)

German Inflation Accelerates

In national terms, prices fell 0.2% on month earlier, but rose 1.3% on the year in April, the country’s statistics office said. In European Union harmonized terms, prices fell 0.3% on month and rose 1.1% on the year.