The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (9 December 2016)

Economists See Fed Moving Faster on Rate Increases

(…) Some expect inflation to pick up on its own. Some say President-elect Donald Trump’s tax and spending plans could boost price pressures. Others see Mr. Trump’s Fed nominees advocating a more hawkish path for interest rates.

The economists’ predictions for the benchmark federal-funds rate averaged 1.26% by December 2017, which implies four rate increases of 0.25 percentage point each between now and the end of next year. The economists overwhelmingly said the Fed will raise rates at its Dec. 13-14 meeting, which suggests they expect three moves in 2017.

In the November survey, the economists’ estimates averaged 1.17%.

Fed officials, in their September economic projections, penciled in one quarter-percentage-point rate increase this year and two in 2017. (…)

Other economists surveyed see inflation picking up steam in the coming years, which would could lead to more Fed rate increases than currently anticipated. (…)

Why Odds May Be Fading for a Near-Term U.S. Recession

(…) the odds are gradually declining, having dropped to 17% in The Wall Street Journal’s latest monthly survey. That’s still about one-in-six odds over the next year, which is somewhat higher than we’ve seen in recent years. But it’s accurate to say that many economists are slowly lowering their warning flags.

(…) economists are now forecasting higher rates and inflation than they were before the election. But many share the assessment that inflation, in particular, has been too low in recent years, and that somewhat higher inflation would be a welcome development. (…)

Typically, the wealth effect of rising stock prices provides some lift to consumption and should provide some pep for the economy. (…)

CEOs and CFOs See Greater 2017 Risks Than Other Executives

(…) Nearly three quarters of 735 executives surveyed, or 72%, said developments around the world had created a riskier business environment than in previous years.Of those surveyed, 78 were CEOs and 100 were CFOs. (…)

Protiviti and the university surveyed executives and board members in a variety of industries globally this fall, before the U.S. presidential election. (…)

Respondents cited economic conditions most frequently as constituting a risk for 2017—with 72% of executives saying they expected conditions to have a “significant impact” on their businesses in the new year. (…)

In last year’s survey, by contrast, executives most frequently cited regulatory changes as a risk that they would face in 2016.

This year, regulatory changes are the second most frequently cited risk: 66% of the executives cited such changes as likely to have a “significant impact”  on their businesses in 2017.(…)

OECD LEIs Tick Ever So Slightly Higher as the OECD Trumpets Gaining Momentum

The OECD itself reports the following analytical assessment of its release this month:
* Signs of growth gaining momentum have emerged in the CLIs for the United States, Canada, Germany, and France. In the United Kingdom, there are also signs of improvement in the short term, although uncertainty persists about the nature of the agreement the U.K. will eventually conclude with the EU.
* Growth is expected to gain momentum in China and India, in particular, and also in Brazil and Russia, albeit from low levels.
* In the OECD area as a whole, Japan, and the euro area as a whole, the CLIs point to stable growth momentum.
* In Italy, the CLI show signs of easing growth.

large image

High five But Haver Analytics’ Robert Brusca is less enthused:

On balance, the OECD CLI indicators can be construed to be showing some improvement or gain in momentum as the OECD has chosen to do, but when placed of a scale of truth the real story is how meager and nascent this improvement is and that weak the growth continues to be in train. In the case of the U.S., the CLI has ticked up by a net of 0.2 points in the course of two months after being stuck at a reading of 99.1. The ratio of the current U.S. CLI to its value of six months ago is higher by just 0.1 and that is a very sour note on which to hang a song of improvement.

The OECD is a membership organization. I very much get the impression that members are trying to put the best spin possible on the interpretation of these readings. I do not find the OECD report encouraging in the least and find the ‘improvements’ posted this month as in the range of normal variation and unconvincing as yet as to the ongoing nature of improvement.

Household Net Worth Hit Record $90.2 Trillion

Stockholdings—both directly and through retirement accounts like 401(k)s—climbed by $494 billion last quarter while real estate, which is primarily people’s homes, rose in value by $554 billion, according to a Federal Reserve report released Thursday.

The report shows that U.S. households, in aggregate, had tremendous assets at their disposal, about $105 trillion against about $15 trillion of debt. That wealth has likely grown since the report was released because the stock market has rallied dramatically over the past month. (…)

OPEC’s Historic Deal Won’t Be Enough to Drain Oil Stockpiles

(…) Bloomberg News calculations based on OPEC data show that across the whole of 2017 there will be little overall reduction in record oil inventories — even if the group convinces non-members to join supply curbs at a meeting on Saturday.

“Even with 100 percent compliance from both OPEC and non-OPEC producers global stocks are unlikely to fall in the first half of 2017,” said Tamas Varga, analyst at brokerage PVM Oil Associates Ltd. in London. “That should keep oil prices in check.” (…)

OPEC’s track record shows the group only delivers 80 percent of promised cuts. While Russia has pledged to come to the party and lower output by 300,000 barrels a day in the first half of 2017, other non-OPEC producers, such as Mexico, Azerbaijan and Colombia, are likely to dress up involuntary production declines, already factored in by traders, as cuts. That scenario would leave largely unchanged the 300 million-barrel global stockpile surplus Del Pino and his colleagues are targeting. (…)

The Dream Stock Market

It’s the season when Wall Street strategists dust off their crystal balls and predict what markets will do for the year ahead, while conveniently forgetting what they said 12 months ago. (…)

History suggests investors should ignore these year-ahead guesses. The average strategist hasn’t started a year predicting a stock-market drop in any of the surveys carried out by Bloomberg since 2000, while shares fell one year in three. (…) Strong gains were forecast in 2008, when the market had its worst year in generations. Strategists then became cautious, making their lowest forecast in 2009 since the survey began, only for the market to rebound 23%. (…)

Insiders Send Wrong Signal on Bank Stocks The rally in bank shares has coincided with insider selling that is on pace to set a record.

Bank and industrial stocks have been among the biggest winners in the postelection stock rally, but some are swimming against the tide.

Corporate insiders in these industries have been selling into the rally at an unusually strong pace, according to research firm InsiderScore. At first glance, it is easy to view this as bearish. If high-ranking executives are unloading stock, perhaps investors should consider doing the same. (…)

High five But insiders might choose to sell their stock for reasons that don’t necessarily match the incentives of the typical individual investor.

Some insiders could be locking in profits or exercising options that are close to expiration. Many banking executives in particular have held underwater options in the years following the financial crisis. Bank of America Corp. and Morgan Stanley, for example, have rallied back to mid-2008 levels. If this postelection rally was the first chance to sell, it is hard to argue against doing so no matter how they feel about the future. (…)

The recent banking rally might be overdone for a number of reasons. Insider selling isn’t one of them.

If you missed the Dec. 5 Edge and Odds, you missed this:

(…) A total of 3,500 insiders at Russell 3000 companies have unloaded their own stock in the last three weeks, while 467 purchased shares, according to data from The Washington Service, a Bethesda, Maryland-based provider of insider trading data and news. The number of sellers was higher than the monthly average of 1,832 sellers this year through October. Sellers have also increased from the comparable year-ago period, and buyers have decreased. (…)

Insider buying and selling doesn’t necessarily presage gains or declines in a given firm’s shares, of course. But Wall Street watches the data because insiders are understood to have the best information about their companies’ prospects, and are also typically veterans of their industries with longer-term horizons.

While they have historically tended to sell more than buy, their behavior since the election diverges from investors, who have exhibited a rapid shift in sentiment and poured money into equities. (…)

image_thumb31

“The big increase in insider selling makes sense because we’ve been making all-time market highs,” said Aaron Jett, the Los Angeles-based vice president of global equity research at Bel Air Investment Advisors, which oversees about $8 billion. “A huge portion of their wealth could be tied up with that one stock so they could want to sell to diversify.”

It is normal for executives to sell into market strength, according to Mr. Jett. That said, a prolonged period of outsize selling by insiders would be concerning, he noted.

(…) in the last month, 891 insiders of U.S. financial companies sold shares, compared with 425 executives who added, data from The Washington Service show.

Both Mr. Clissold and Mr. Jett said it is more valuable to pay attention to a pickup in executive buying rather than selling, since sales can occur for personal, idiosyncratic reasons, while stock purchases tend to indicate confidence in the company. (…)

Punch Where the big increase in insider selling makes much less sense is that it is occurring at the end of 2016:

  1. why not wait just a few weeks to defer tax payments by 12 months to April 2018?
  2. why not wait just a few weeks to potentially avoid the 3.8% Obamacare’s net investment income tax which the Trump camp wants to eliminate?
  3. why not wait just a few weeks to potentially benefit from lower capital gains tax rates promised by Republicans?

Insiders’ use of the trading window following quarterly earnings reports has been rising as the year progressed. Sellers steadily increased while buyers became fewer and fewer. Note that the November data on the chart only includes trades after the election.

THE DAILY EDGE (21 November 2016)

Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index Climbs 0.1% in October

The Conference Board’s leading economic index rose 0.1% last month, following a 0.2% increase in September and a 0.2% decline in August.

The increase was driven by the interest rate spread and higher average weekly hours offsetting weaknesses in unemployment insurance claims and new orders.

The board’s coincident index—designed to reflect current economic conditions and made up of four data points including nonfarm payrolls—also rose 0.1% last month after increasing by the same amount in September.

The index of lagging indicators increased 0.2% in October after gaining the same amount in September.

Doug Short has the best charts on the LEI. This recent uptick in the 6m RoC is very welcome.

image

Smoothed LEI

What a Privately Funded Infrastructure Push Could Add to GDP

A well-design infrastructure improvement program relying heavily on private financing could boost the U.S. economy by up to 0.2 percentage points, according to a new report from the McKinsey Global Institute. (…)

The McKinsey report also outlined several other recommendations that together could boost GDP by up to 1.5 percentage points over a decade. But many of the suggestions are unlikely to find much support in the coming Trump administration.

For instance, the report argued for a beefed-up trade policy that would help smaller companies export abroad, support laid-off workers in the U.S. and make it easier for local governments to attract foreign investment, all of which could boost GDP by up to 0.4 percentage points, according to the report. (…)

(…) In an article by the Hollywood Reporter columnist Michael Wolff, Mr. Bannon also said the Trump administration will be squarely focused on job creation, channeling the experimentation seen in the New Deal era of the 1930s. (…)

Mr. Bannon, in the interview, said he is animated by an economic populism that has the potential to create an enduring political realignment in the U.S. (…)

“The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—— over.” In a shot at Democrats’ close ties to Silicon Valley, he continued: “They were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

Mr. Bannon offered a few hints about how Mr. Trump intends to govern. One focus will be a dramatic new public works building program that takes advantage of low interest rates – a project that Democrats have long favored.

“It’s everything related to jobs,” Mr. Bannon said. “The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”

Mortgage Rates Hit 17-Month High Mortgage rates for the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage hit 4.125% on Friday–the highest since July 2015. That is more than half a percentage point higher from the average on election day.

(…) Rates are now well above 4% for the typical 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. The average hit 4.125% on Friday–the highest since July 2015, according to MortgageNewsDaily.com. That is more than half a percentage point higher from the average on election day.

Rates on 30-year fixed mortgages move in tandem with the 10-year Treasury yield, which was 2.34% on Friday afternoon; it was just 1.88% on Nov. 8th. (…)

Dollar’s Rapid Gain Triggers Angst in Emerging Markets The dollar’s strength could slow U.S. corporate profit growth and intensify capital flight from the developing world, which would complicate the prospects for economic growth.

(…) The currency’s gains make foreign goods and travel cheaper for U.S. consumers and could give a boost to exports from Japan and Europe. But they also are reigniting fears that the dollar’s strength could slow U.S. corporate profit growth and intensify capital flight from the developing world, which would complicate the prospects for economic growth. (…)

“The strong dollar is destabilizing for markets, for foreign assets, for emerging-market nations that pay back their debt in dollars,” said Jonathan Lewis, chief investment officer Fiera Capital Inc. “That’s pretty significant.” (…)

The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the U.S. currency against six others, reached its highest level in more than 13 years Friday. (…)

image

Heavy-Duty Truck Order Cancellations Hit Two-Decade High

Cancellations of heavy-duty truck orders soared to the highest rate in more than 20 years last month, according to ACT Research, adding to the woes of manufacturers that have seen new orders for big rigs plummet this year.

Fleet owners in October canceled orders for 8,610 Class 8 truck tractors, the biggest vehicles that carry much of the country’s supply of retail goods, said Jim Meil, principal at ACT Research. That amounted to 10.5% of the backlog of the heavy-duty trucks that have been ordered but not yet built. (…)

Overall orders for heavy-duty trucks fell 46% year-over-year in October, extending a year-long decline in orders that has hit factory operations at companies such as truck maker Navistar International Corp. and engine manufacturer Cummins Inc.

The cancellations “would indeed have some ramifications upstream to the supply chain,” he said.

Oil Climbs as Iran, Iraq Signal Deal Hope Before Vienna Meeting
Final Polls Show Renzi’s Referendum Heading for Defeat in Italy 
MARKET STATS GALORE!

The S&P 500 added 2% since the election. Financial and industrial stocks, meanwhile, have soared far more, and dividend-paying shares — including those in the utility sector — have sold off quickly. The moves come as investors coalesce around a new, post-election market narrative that fiscal stimulus will power economic growth and fuel inflation. (…)

image

As for whether recent dispersion signals will trigger a “Hindenburg Omen” selloff in the broader market? LPL’s Mr. Detrick thinks not. He says that the selloff of bond-like securities is skewing the number of recent losers and masks strength in small stocks, many of which aren’t traded on the NYSE. The Russell 2000 Index of small company shares rose for the 11th day in a row on Friday, the longest stretch since 2003.

Caveat here: the NYSE includes a large number of non-operating interest-sensitive securities such as closed-end bond funds and preferred stocks which often distort NYSE breadth when interest rates move rapidly. Lowry Research calculates an Advance-Decline ratio based solely on common stocks of domestic operating company. This ratio climbed very close to its September all-time high last week.

A similar disparity is apparent in stocks at New 52-week Highs.  The number of All-Issues New Highs has yet to exceed levels immediately after the June Brexit low. In contrast, this week OCO New Highs reached their highest level since March 2014.  In brief, the improvement in Demand has been accompanied by a surge in breadth, signaled by gains in both the OCO Adv-Dec Line and in OCO New Highs, all characteristics of a healthy rally.

But just to blur things even more, Barron’s adds these significant numbers:

According to Howard Silverblatt, the S&P Dow Jones Indices senior index analyst and maven, the 1.98% postelection gain in the S&P 500 would have been just 0.62% without the 10.77% bump in the S&P Financials. Some 34.6% of the S&P’s advance came from just five of their members: Wells Fargo (ticker: WFC), Bank of America (BAC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), and Citigroup (C).

Obviously, small caps trumped most market stats last week:

(…) There is good reason for small-caps’ outsize reaction. Although it hasn’t been discussed much since Trump’s victory, the president-elect won on a platform calling for more protectionism and less global trade. That would benefit smaller companies, which typically generate less than 20% of sales overseas, over larger companies, whose non-U.S. sales exceed 30%.

At the same time, Trump’s desire to cut the corporate tax rate to 15% would be a major benefit for small companies, which generally don’t have the resources or geographic reach to bring their tax rates much below the 35% federal rate. Some large multinationals, in contrast, have pushed their tax rates down to the teens. Less regulation, also espoused by Trump, would also benefit small companies, which are less able than big ones to afford hefty compliance costs.

The potential for greater inflation, accompanied by higher bond yields, would also work to small-caps’ advantage. When prices fall, a typical company makes less money on the products it sells. Large companies generally have more room than small ones to cut costs to protect profit margins. But more inflation would benefit small-caps as the process reverses, says Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at Wells Capital Management. Smaller stocks have outperformed larger ones in rising-rate periods. (…)

Also from Barron’s:

TrimTabs data show a veritable tsunami into equity exchange-traded funds in the seven days following the election, some $44.6 billion. That was the second-biggest surge in its records, exceeded only in July 2007, which Charles pointedly notes was not long before the peak in the U.S. equity market that autumn.

That was corroborated by other fund-data crunchers. Equity ETFs and mutual funds drew $25.39 billion in the postelection week ended on Wednesday, write Bank of America Merrill Lynch economists, citing EPFR numbers. (That squares with TrimTabs, which finds that part of the flood of money into ETFs represents cash exiting conventional mutual funds, largely a result of the ongoing exodus to passive index vehicles from actively managed funds.)

BofA ML said the weekly influx was the biggest into equities since December 2014. The outflows from bonds, meanwhile, was the largest since the taper tantrum of June 2013, a term that describes how the debt market spiked yields higher at the hint that the Federal Reserve was contemplating the end of its bond-buying program.

What to make out of all these numbers?
  • Lowry’s OCO A-D line peaked last September, along with the S&P 500 Index which subsequently lost 1.6%.
  • Lowry’s OCO New Highs have reached their best level since March 2014. The S&P 500 advanced 14% during the following 12 months, a period during which the S&P 500 EPS rose 11% with stable inflation. The Rule of 20 P/E went from 19.0 to 19.9 during this time frame.
  • The surge in equity influx in December 2014 coincided with the S&P 500 Index reaching 2130, a high not matched for another 22 months.
  • Last week’s influx into equity funds was dominated by funds moving into Russell 2000 ETFs and other small cap funds. The Russell 2000 peaked on June 24, 2015 and cratered 27% by mid-February 2016.

In all, recent data mining seems rather complicated by the big rotations going on from interest-sensitive to economy-sensitive stocks and from large to small cap equities. These herd movements are rarely the best of times to go with the flow. I will publish an updated market view tomorrow.

EARNINGS WATCH

From Factset:

Overall, 95% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings to date for the third quarter. Of these companies, 72% have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimate, 7% have reported actual EPS equal to the mean EPS estimate, and 21% have reported actual EPS below the mean EPS estimate. The percentage of companies that have reported EPS above the mean EPS estimate is above the 1-year (70%) average and above the 5-year (67%) average.

In aggregate, companies have reported earnings that exceeded estimated by 6.3%. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (+4.8%) average and above the 5-year (+4.4%) average.

In terms of revenues, 55% of companies have reported actual sales above estimated sales and 45% have reported actual sales below estimated sales. The percentage of companies that have reported sales above estimates is above the 1- year average (50%) and above the 5-year average (54%).

In aggregate, companies have reported sales that exceeded estimates by 0.5%. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (0.0%) average but below the 5-year (+0.6%) average.

The blended earnings growth rate for the third quarter is 3.0% this week, which is above the blended earnings growth rate of 2.9% last week. Upside earnings surprises reported by companies in the Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology sectors were mainly responsible for the increase in the overall earnings growth rate for the index during the past week.

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would improve to 6.4% from 3.0%.

The blended revenue growth rate for Q3 2016 is 2.7%. The third quarter marks the first time the index has seen yearover-year growth in sales since Q4 2014 (2.0%).

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 would improve to 4.5% from 2.7%.

image

At this point in time, 100 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q4 2016. Of these 100 companies, 68 have issued negative EPS guidance and 32 have issued positive EPS guidance. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance is 68%, which is below the 5-year average of 74%.

However, IT companies’ guidance for Q4’16 is an uncharacteristic 12 negatives and 16 positives, a sharp reversal from guidance for Q3’16 which was 19 negatives and 14 positives at the same time. If we exclude IT, guidance for Q4 is 79% negative, up from 73% in Q3.

Thomson Reuters now sees Q4 EPS up 6.3%, down from 8.3% on October 1st.

Japan’s Nikkei Enters Bull Market

(…) The Nikkei was the second Asian stock index to enter a bull market so far this month, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 20% from a January low last Friday. (…)